Thursday, March 10, 2005

Stewardship

I am one of those few Americans who rates environmental issues as a top priority. If you look on national political polls you'll usually see folks like me indicated by a little 1 or * somewhere towards the bottom of the listl.

This has always confused me. After all, what group of values holds that it is okay to poison the resources I use to live, or strip them away so that they won't be there for the future? I'm not militant in the traditional hyper-eco way, I just believe that good stewardship of our resources and environment is good policy. Good for health, good for jobs, and good for the future. I see it as similar to putting money in the bank. A small capital investment now, for a more bountious future.

So, it is very heartening to read that religious organizations are finally beginning to step into the fray as described in this article in the New York Times (registration needed, but worth it). Particularly interesting is the following:
"We're not adverse to government-mandated prohibitions on behavioral sin such as abortion," he said. "We try to restrict it. So why, if we're social tinkering to protect the sanctity of human life, ought we not be for a little tinkering to protect the environment?"
It looks like the secret weapon of the right is about to take up a cause that is distinctly left wing. And, the era of meaningful discussion about small government seems to be passing as well. It looks like the shift has already begun.

2 Comments:

At 5/01/2006 11:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Environmental issues are the foundation of all other issues: Peace in the Middle East, Crime, Immigration, Cancer research... all else is irrelevant if the planet cannot support stable, food-producing life.

 
At 5/02/2006 2:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Working with dysfunctional kids helps to see more clearly dysfunctional relationships in general. Contemporary society in the west is a bit spoiled at this point. The great depression and the two world wars shaped the 20th century, creating systems with society and government that are mindful of the consequences that created those crises. Environmental issues have yet to create consequences for the west that is severe enough for society to learn from. Perhaps if you live in the west or on the gulf coast you might be learning (hopefully) a bit quicker than the rest of the country, but I suspect until we have another global crisis that forces the vast majority of people to abstain from consumption nothing significant will change.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home